Donald J. Trump’s presidency has always been characterized by bold and often controversial initiatives, and the list of 50 new things he plans to implement in office promises to follow suit.
Among these proposals, a focus on economic revitalization stands out. Trump aims to introduce tax reforms designed to stimulate business investment and job creation, alongside a commitment to reducing regulations that he believes hinder the American industry. By promoting a pro-business environment, he hopes to invigorate the economy and attract both domestic and foreign investments.
Another significant aspect of Trump’s agenda includes a push for enhanced national security. This encompasses plans to bolster military funding, modernize defense systems, and prioritize border security measures. Trump’s approach emphasizes a strict stance on immigration policy and seeks to address what he perceives as gaps in enforcement, reflecting his long-standing campaign rhetoric. He envisions a comprehensive strategy that would not only defend physical borders but also counteract cyber threats and international terrorism, thereby ensuring the safety and security of American citizens.
In addition to economic and security reforms, Trump is also keen on revamping healthcare and education systems. His proposals include a reevaluation of the Affordable Care Act, aiming to increase competition among providers and decrease the overall cost of healthcare. In the realm of education, he emphasizes school choice, advocating for policies that would allow parents more freedom in selecting educational options for their children. By implementing these diverse strategies, Trump hopes to leave a lasting impact on crucial facets of American life, Shaping the country’s trajectory during his time in office.
In an executive order, Trump suspended the entry of all undocumented migrants to the US, and border patrol agents have been instructed to turn people away without granting them asylum hearings.
Before the order, migrants were able to arrive at the US border and had the legal right to seek asylum.
In June 2024, however, the Biden administration issued its executive order that temporarily suspended the right to seek asylum for those who did not arrive at an official point of entry, or without an appointment using CBP One, a mobile application. In September, asylum restrictions were tightened further.
Trump has also halted the US refugee resettlement program. Under Biden in 2024, the US accepted more than 100,000 refugees – its highest since 1995.
He also ended a major Biden-era program that allowed up to 30,000 migrants per month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to fly into the US on humanitarian grounds.
The “Remain in Mexico” policy from Trump’s first term will be reinstated as well. This forced non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait in Mexico until their asylum claims in the US were resolved. It impacted around 71,000 people under Trump’s first term.
The controversial policy was regularly criticized by immigration advocates, who said that the migrants were often left in Mexico for months and sometimes were preyed upon by criminal gangs.
There is an estimated backlog of 3.6m cases in US immigration courts, and migrants often have to wait years. Many have been left wondering whether those cases will still be heard.
Trump has fired several top immigration court officials since taking office, however, which may impact the processing of those cases.
Trump fights for women’s rights, is it a facade for the presidency or a stand to fight against the wrongdoings?
Donald Trump’s relationship with women’s rights has been complex and often controversial. Throughout his presidency and public life, Trump has made statements and taken actions that have drawn both criticism and support from various segments of the population.
On one hand, Trump has appointed several women to prominent positions in his administration, including Elaine Chao as Secretary of Transportation and Kellyanne Conway as a senior advisor. He has often highlighted these appointments as evidence of his commitment to gender equality in leadership roles.
However, Trump has also faced significant backlash for his comments about women, particularly concerning issues of sexual harassment and assault. His past remarks, including those caught on tape in the “Access Hollywood” incident, have raised serious concerns among many women’s rights advocates.
On policy matters, Trump’s administration has been criticized for rolling back reproductive rights, including attempting to defund Planned Parenthood and support measures that restrict access to abortion. His judicial appointments have also been viewed as a threat to women’s rights, particularly about potential challenges to Roe v. Wade.
Overall, while there have been instances where Trump has positioned himself as supportive of women in certain contexts, many believe that his broader actions and rhetoric do not align with the principles of women’s rights and equality. The polarized views on his approach make it a contentious topic among both his supporters and detractors.
“Championing Tradition: Trump’s Stance on Women’s Rights and Gender Ideology”
Donald J. Trump has positioned himself as a defender of women’s rights by actively opposing what he refers to as gender ideology. He argues that the rise of this ideology undermines traditional definitions of gender and could lead to policies that he believes are detrimental to women.
(ii) promoting differential treatment of or providing special benefits to individuals based on race, sex, color, or ethnicity.
in simple terms means –
It’s about treating people differently or giving special advantages based on their race, gender, skin color, or background.
The term “gender ideology” has the meaning given to that term in section 2(f) of the Executive Order of January 20, 2025, (Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government).
The term “gender ideology” refers to a specific definition stated in a government order from January 20, 2025, which focuses on protecting women’s rights and emphasizing biological facts within the federal government.
The term “gender ideology” has the meaning given to that term in section 2(f) of the Executive Order of January 20, 2025, (Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government).
The term “gender ideology” refers to a specific definition stated in a government order from January 20, 2025, which focuses on protecting women’s rights and emphasizing biological facts within the federal government.
“Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true. Gender ideology includes the idea that there is a vast spectrum of genders that are disconnected from one’s sex. Gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but maintains that a person can be born in the wrong sexed body.
(g) “Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.
Sec. 3. Recognizing Women Are Biologically Distinct From Men. (a) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide to the U.S. Government, external partners, and the public clear guidance expanding on the sex-based definitions outlined in this order.
(b) Each agency and all Federal employees shall enforce laws governing sex-based rights, protections, opportunities, and accommodations to protect men and women as biologically distinct sexes. Each agency should therefore give the terms “sex”, “male”, “female”, “men”, “women”, “boys” and “girls” the meanings outlined in section 2 of this order when interpreting or applying statutes, regulations, or guidance and in all other official agency business, documents, and communications.
(c) When administering or enforcing sex-based distinctions, every agency and all Federal employees acting in an official capacity on behalf of their agency shall use the term “sex” and not “gender” in all applicable Federal policies and documents.
(d) The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall implement changes to require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards, accurately reflect the holder’s sex, as defined under section 2 of this order; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall ensure that applicable personnel records accurately report Federal employees’ sex, as defined by section 2 of this order.
(e) Agencies shall remove all statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other internal and external messages that promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology, and shall cease issuing such statements, policies, regulations, forms, communications, or other messages. Agency forms that require an individual’s sex shall list male or female, and shall not request gender identity. Agencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.
(f) The prior Administration argued that the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which addressed Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, requires gender identity-based access to single-sex spaces under, for example, Title IX of the Educational Amendments Act. This position is legally untenable and has harmed women. The Attorney General shall therefore immediately issue guidance to agencies to correct the misapplication of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) to sex-based distinctions in agency activities. In addition, the Attorney General shall issue guidance and assist agencies in protecting sex-based distinctions, which are explicitly permitted under Constitutional and statutory precedent.
(g) Federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology. Each agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.